[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#609638: marked as done (Please, include p4-clockmod on linux-image)

Your message dated Sun, 03 Jun 2012 04:00:15 +0100
with message-id <1338692415.3979.128.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: Please, include p4-clockmod on linux-image
has caused the Debian Bug report #609638,
regarding Please, include p4-clockmod on linux-image
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
609638: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609638
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist

Please, include p4-clockmod in the linux-image kernels provided by
Debian. Otherwise, some people may not have any kind of frequency
control.

In my particular case, I use a Pentium D 805 (with arch amd64), which does
not work with acpi-cpufreq, but only with p4-clockmod. This should, in
principle, be only a matter of setting it to be compiled, say, as a module:

,----
| rbrito@chagas:/tmp$ grep P4_CLOCKMOD /boot/config-2.6.37-trunk-amd64 
| # CONFIG_X86_P4_CLOCKMOD is not set
| rbrito@chagas:/tmp$ 
`----


Thanks, Rogério Brito.

-- 
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA
http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 3.2.1-1

I changed my mind on this, but forgot to close this bug report along
with the other.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Knowledge is power.  France is bacon.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: