Hi, On 31.05.2012 03:43, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I don't think so. As I understand it, the in-tree version does not yet > have all the features of the out-of-tree version, and some features may > have to be implemented differently (more integrated with the rest of the > kernel). You might know better than me whether the code implementation is different to the DKMS module, but I think kernel 3.3 integrates all features as of Openvswitch 1.4 which makes it ABI compatible to the client utils at least [1] > > Have you tried building the kernel with this option? Does the in-tree > module work properly with the existing utilities package? I guess so but I didn't try. I will do so and come back to you once I tried. [1] http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/announce/2012-March/000043.html -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature