Bug#506758: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: boot hang caused by bttv driver with twinhan vp-1020)
Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 00:32:28 -0500
with message-id <20120525053228.GA28129@burratino>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: boot hang caused by bttv driver with twinhan vp-1020
has caused the Debian Bug report #506758,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: boot hang caused by bttv driver with twinhan vp-1020
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
506758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506758
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: boot hang caused by bttv driver with twinhan vp-1020
- From: Dominik Paulus <debian_bugs@temporaryforwarding.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:51:29 +0100
- Message-id: <20081124145129.8807.79873.reportbug@froschkaiser.Bussardweg13>
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-10
Severity: important
Current linux kernels contain an issue that renders the dvb-bt8xx driver
unusable for cards without an EEPROM (like mine). I described the
problem in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12066
My DVB card isn't properly detected by the kernel and, as I described in
the kernel bugzilla bug report, causes the kernel to crash when loading
the bttv kernel module, which is automatically done by udev on my debian
lenny installation.
I'm currently using a patched 2.6.27 kernel, but I just tested the
newest debian linux-image and the problem still exists.
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.27.7 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.24 Debian configuration management sy
ii initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.92j tools for generating an initramfs
ii module-init-tools 3.4-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo
linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 recommends no packages.
Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 suggests:
ii grub 0.97-47 GRand Unified Bootloader (Legacy v
pn linux-doc-2.6.26 <none> (no description available)
-- debconf information excluded
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 506758-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: boot hang caused by bttv driver with twinhan vp-1020
- From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 00:32:28 -0500
- Message-id: <20120525053228.GA28129@burratino>
- In-reply-to: <20081124145129.8807.79873.reportbug@froschkaiser.Bussardweg13>
- References: <20081124145129.8807.79873.reportbug@froschkaiser.Bussardweg13>
Hi again,
Dominik Paulus wrote:
> Current linux kernels contain an issue that renders the dvb-bt8xx driver
> unusable for cards without an EEPROM (like mine). I described the
> problem in
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12066
Thanks for reporting it, and sorry to take so long to reply.
Jonathan Nieder wrote (upstream):
> Do you still have access to this hardware? If so, can you reproduce this bug
> with current (3.x.y) kernels?
If it's reproducible with current kernels, we can pursue this
upstream. If it's reproducible in squeeze and not sid, we can try to
find what patch fixed it and apply it to squeeze. Without that
information I don't expect much progress, so closing.
I'd be happy to revisit this if more information becomes available,
though. Sorry we didn't get to this in time.
Sincerely,
Jonathan
--- End Message ---
Reply to: