[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Renaming linux-2.6 source package, keeping bugs



On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 21:21 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 02:44:31PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 14:13 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[...]
> > > Given the number of bugs involved, perhaps we
> > > need to teach debbugs that "linux-2.6" should be considered as an alias
> > > for "linux" for the purposes of queries and of input to submit@ and
> > > control@.
> > > 
> > > Ben, do you have any constraints on the timeline for this that we should
> > > know about?
> > 
> > No rush.
> 
> But it would be kind of nice to be able to rename the package before
> the wheezy freeze.
> 
> > > Don, what do you think about all this?  I think it's tractable, but it
> > > feels like a pretty solid weekend's work to me.
>  
> Has any work been done on this, or are any BTS changes actually
> necessary?

Ping!

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
You can't have everything.  Where would you put it?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: