On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 10:27 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote: > Dear kernel team, > > I do not really consider this a valid request currently as upstream is > not actively persuing (at least now) integration of the SARef changes in > the main kernel (at least to my knowledge). Either this bug should be > closed or reassigned as a minor wishlist bug to openswan which will be > reassigned to the kernel again when upstream openswan and upstream > kernel get to a decision (just my opinion as openswan debian uploader > and openswan upstream commiter). There is no need to close this. I have marked this as upstream wishlist, and we basically leave submitters to make the case for such requests with upstream themselves. You could create/clone a wishlist bug in openswan and mark it blocked by this. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part