On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 08:56 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote: [...] > With only a superficial few hours on each kernel, I verified > The problem with kernel 3.2.23 and no problem with kernel > 3.2.23 + patch. > > Note: the majority of my testing (one or two hundred hours) were > Done with Ubuntu server edition 12.04, Kernel 3.2.0-24-generic > #39, and all three of: > 556061b00c9f2fd6a5524b6bde823ef12f299ecf > 5aaa0b7a2ed5b12692c9ffb5222182bd558d3146 I have queued these up to be reviewed for inclusion in Linux 3.2.25. > 5167e8d5417bf5c322a703d2927daec727ea40dd This was included in Linux 3.2.24. Ben. > manually backedited. > > By the way this non-distro 3.2.23 kernel seems to run a lot faster > than the Ubuntu distro 3.2.0-24 kernel. -- Ben Hutchings It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part