On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 22:14 -0700, Sarveshwar.Bandi@Emulex.Com wrote: > Ben, > I am sorry I missed this mail. Is your comment with respect to these > two patches or are you asking me why I haven’t given any further > updates? Just those specific two patches. Ben. > Thanks, > Sarvesh > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:email@example.com] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:59 AM > To: Bandi,Sarveshwar > Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: Re: Bug#673391: Revised patches for be2net > > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 06:45 -0700, Sarveshwar.Bandi@Emulex.Com wrote: > > Ben, > > I am attaching the remaining to patches: > > 68aad78 sweep the floors and convert some .get_drvinfo routines to > > strlcpy e5686ad netdev: make net_device_ops const > > > > Please apply them too. > > I don't see the point. But do let us know (in a new bug report) if and when there are substantial bug fixes or new hardware support. > > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings > Lowery's Law: > If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway. -- Ben Hutchings Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part