On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 21:49 +0200, Hans-Juergen Mauser wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > I think it's fine and has nothing to do with the problem.
> >
> > Since you say it has taken 1-8 days for any problem to appear, I suppose
> > you will have to wait a few weeks to have some confidence that
> > 'nowatchdog' makes a difference.
>
>
> well, even if you think it has nothing to do with the problem, now I am
> almost sure it has. Nothing is more evident than uptime:
>
> netfinity5000:~# uptime
> 21:39:39 up 21 days, 4:39, 2 users, load average: 0,13, 0,10, 0,07
>
> For comparison, see the last mail I added to this bug, the maximal
> continuous operation time was nothing more than about 8 days.
I agree, it does sound like you were right. Sorry for being so
sceptical.
> It would be great if anyone took care of this bug, maybe there are other
> people getting hit by this and not being able to track it down.
>
> Would you recommend me to report this on bugzilla.kernel.org ?
Either there or LKML (linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org). On Bugzilla it
think it would belong under Platform Specific/Hardware, i386.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.
- Robert Coveyou
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part