Bug#680934: linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: sch5636 module not built by default
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.16-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
sensors-detect of the lm-sensors suite detected that the sch5636 module
would be the approprite driver for the sensor chip of my motherboard
(a common Fujitsu Esprimo board).
This driver is part of the upstream kernel since 3.1.something, but not
yet being shipped as a module in the default debian kernel packages.
Please consider adding CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH5636 to the default debian
kernel configuration.
Thanks,
//Urs Ganse
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 3.2.0-2-amd64 (Debian 3.2.16-1) (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-1) ) #1 SMP Mon Apr 30 05:20:23 UTC 2012
** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-2-amd64 root=UUID=89b24e36-b686-490d-9db1-5b33a164567c ro quiet
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64 depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.40
ii initramfs-tools [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.102
ii linux-base 3.3
ii module-init-tools 3.16-1
Versions of packages linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64 recommends:
ii firmware-linux-free 3.1
Versions of packages linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64 suggests:
pn grub-pc 1.99-12
pn linux-doc-3.2 <none>
Versions of packages linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64 is related to:
pn firmware-atheros <none>
pn firmware-bnx2 <none>
pn firmware-bnx2x <none>
pn firmware-brcm80211 <none>
pn firmware-intelwimax <none>
pn firmware-ipw2x00 <none>
pn firmware-ivtv <none>
pn firmware-iwlwifi <none>
pn firmware-libertas <none>
pn firmware-linux <none>
pn firmware-linux-nonfree 0.36
pn firmware-myricom <none>
pn firmware-netxen <none>
pn firmware-qlogic <none>
pn firmware-ralink <none>
pn firmware-realtek 0.36
pn xen-hypervisor <none>
-- debconf information excluded
Reply to: