[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#610949: second ls lists empty directory



On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:59:11PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:07:40PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> In January, 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> 
> >>> * Create ~/Private with ecryptfs-setup-private.
> >>> * Touch ~/Private/x.
> >>> * ls ~/Private/ -> x is listed.
> >>> * ls ~/Private/ -> x is NOT listed anymore.
> >>
> >> Thanks for reporting it.  Do you happen to remember what kernel you were using?
> [...]
> >>> Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/1 CPU core)
> >
> > That one. Most certainly on NFS, which is a known bug, I think.
> That's a package name (which includes the ABI version) rather than a
> version number.  I ask because there have been some ecryptfs fixes in
> 2.6.32.y recently and I don't want to spend too much time hunting if
> the bug has already been fixed.

Pretty sure the current version at the time I reported that bug (i.e. the most
current stuff either in security or stable-proposed-updates). And no, sadly I
don't have logs going back to Jan 2011. But we keep our clients up-to-date and
test p-u.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: