[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#662902: Please include the sbs-battery driver (CONFIG_BATTERY_SBS=m)



On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 10:43:25AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Less so, but yes.  As far as I know, sbs-battery drives a superset of
> > hardware, but bq20z75 does drive a useful subset (though one that
> > doesn't include the hardware I actually have).  Having bq20z75 in the
> > wheezy 3.2 kernel wouldn't serve the particular purpose I had in mind
> > for it, but it seems potentially useful.
> 
> Do you know of relevant patches that could change that?  (I.e., maybe
> this is a candidate for a driver backport.)

I just reviewed the history of sbs-battery and bq20z75 carefully, and it
looks like my guess does not match reality: sbs-battery and bq20z75
drive the same hardware, and the change just represents a rename.  I do
see a couple of fixes to sbs-battery after the renaming that seem
potentially useful, but not sufficiently so to backport them unless
someone needs them.

- Josh Triplett



Reply to: