[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#626427: [Sabahattin Gucukoglu: Re: linux-image-2.6.38-2-686: Horrible Time Skew, Eventual Near-zero Responsiveness]



Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:

> Please redirect to the BTS if you think it's relevant. :-)

Thanks, doing so.
--- Begin Message ---
Yeah, sorry about that.  Debian insist on running the craptastic procmail, and since it doesn't like my primary email address,I had to rewrite it.  Except I rewrote it with my primary address extension by accident and that's what happened.  Evidently my choice to leave it be wasn't advisable. :-(

The kernel team seem to be unable to find the cause with the info I gave them.  Since AFAICT I have nothing more to give them (will check later) and since it has been quite a long while, I think it's best the bug remain closed.  What's more, this old clunker is on the way out (poor thing!) and will soon be replaced with a Mac, so if I run Linux it'll be in a VM or on my existing Mac Mini (could be entirely viable if I get a serial adaptor that works).

Please redirect to the BTS if you think it's relevant. :-)

On 25 May 2012, at 07:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>> On 17 May 2011, at 04:05, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> Please report this bug upstream at <https://bugzilla.kernel.org> under
>>> product 'ACPI', component 'Other'.  Include the information you've sent
>>> here - the logs from 2.6.32 and from 2.6.39-rc6, and the possible
>>> connection with brltty.  Let us know the bug number or URL so we can
>>> track it.
>> 
>> OK, done.  Bug 35772 at:
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D35772
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> My braille display is away for repair; I won't be able to get more
>> information until it returns.  Sorry for delays.
> 
> Sorry for the slow reply.  Any news?  What kernel are you using these
> days, and does brltty work okay with it?

NP.  uname -r says 3.2.0-2-686-pae.  The kernel devs said I should turn off ACPI, so I did.  Now, the clock is dead on to the speaking clock.  I have to assume it worked. :-)

The display was upgraded through one model by the manufacturer.  The protocol and configuration are identical from a software perspective.  The clock source is now the TSC.  ACPI being off really doesn't make much of a difference to this always-on box, and if it's more stable, which it is, then I'm happier.

HTH

Cheers,
Sabahattin

--- End Message ---

Reply to: