[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#668142: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-686: serial_unthrottle+0x44/0x5a [usbserial]()



On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 09:51 +0200, Christian Felsing wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-41squeeze2
> Severity: normal
> 
> 
> After restart of Asterisk following line appeared in syslog:
> 
> [79419.383260] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [79419.383274] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_i386_openvz/drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c:440 serial_unthrottle+0x44/0x5a [usbserial]()
[...]

It looks like this was fixed upstream by:

commit 7b292b4bf9a9d6098440d85616d6ca4c608b8304
Author: Andrew McGregor <andrew.mcgregor@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date:   Mon Jun 13 11:31:31 2011 +1200

    tty: fix "IRQ45: nobody cared"

The symptom mentioned here (unexpected IRQ) is different but I think the
underlying bug is the same.

Can you test the attached patch against the stable kernel?  Instructions
for this can be found at:
<http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official>.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
From: Andrew McGregor <andrew.mcgregor@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:31:31 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] tty: fix "IRQ45: nobody cared"

commit 7b292b4bf9a9d6098440d85616d6ca4c608b8304 upstream.

Unthrottling the TTY during close ends up enabling interrupts
on a device not on the active list, which will never have the
interrupts cleared.  Doctor, it hurts when I do this.

>>> On 6/2/2011 at 01:56 AM, in message <20110601145608.3e586e16@bob.linux.org.uk>, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:34:07 +1200
> "andrew mcgregor" <andrew.mcgregor@alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> > The LKML message
> > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/2/25/4541847 from
> > February doesn't seem to have been resolved since.  We struck the
> > issue, and the patch below (against 2.6.32) fixes it.  Should I
> > supply a patch against 3.0.0rc?
>
> I think that would be sensible. I don't actually see how you hit it as
> the IRQ ought to be masked by then but it's certainly wrong for n_tty
> to be calling into check_unthrottle at that point.
>
> So yes please send a patch with a suitable Signed-off-by: line to
> linux-serial and cc GregKH <greg@kroah.com> as well.
>
> Alan

Signed-off-by: Andrew McGregor <andrew.mcgregor@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
[bwh: Backported to 2.6.32 again: change filename]
---
--- a/drivers/char/n_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/char/n_tty.c
@@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ static void reset_buffer_flags(struct tty_struct *tty)
 	tty->canon_head = tty->canon_data = tty->erasing = 0;
 	memset(&tty->read_flags, 0, sizeof tty->read_flags);
 	n_tty_set_room(tty);
-	check_unthrottle(tty);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1574,6 +1573,7 @@ static int n_tty_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 	reset_buffer_flags(tty);
+	tty_unthrottle(tty);
 	tty->column = 0;
 	n_tty_set_termios(tty, NULL);
 	tty->minimum_to_wake = 1;

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: