[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#587538: marked as done (lshw is provoking a system crash on a sun sparc T1000 machine)



Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:21:46 -0500
with message-id <20120317002146.GA465@burratino>
and subject line Re: lshw is provoking a system crash on a sun sparc T1000 machine
has caused the Debian Bug report #587538,
regarding lshw is provoking a system crash on a sun sparc T1000 machine
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
587538: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lshw
Version: 02.13-2
Severity: Critical

When I invoke lshw on a sunfire T1000 machine the system crashes and
it drops to the {ok} prompt.

machine:~# lshw
[  646.549492] SUN4V-DTLB: Error at TPC[f7d08134], tl 1
[  646.549676] SUN4V-DTLB: TPC<0xf7d0813c>
[  646.549776] SUN4V-DTLB: O7[31de0]
[  646.549870] SUN4V-DTLB: O7<0x31de8>
[  646.549966] SUN4V-DTLB: vaddr[f7f4c000] ctx[bc1]
pte[98000000000e0610] error[2]
Program terminated
{1} ok
{1} ok

Here is some more information about the system:

machine:~# uname -a
Linux machine 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Wed May 12 21:24:38 UTC 2010
sparc64 GNU/Linux

machine:~# cat /etc/debian_version
5.0.4

Will provide you with more info on demand.

Best,
Ivaylo Ganchev



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ivaylo Ganchev wrote:

>> When I invoke lshw on a sunfire T1000 machine the system crashes and
>> it drops to the {ok} prompt.
>
> That's no good.  Could you find out what system call is causing this,
> using strace?

Closing due to lack of response, but if you get more information on
this we'd be happy to revisit it.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: