[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#649468: marked as done (FTBFS on Alpha: undefined iowrite32be wanted by module mlx4_en.)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:07:22 -0600
with message-id <20120215220722.GA28293@burratino>
and subject line Re: [PATCH] alpha: add io{read,write}{16,32}be functions
has caused the Debian Bug report #649468,
regarding FTBFS on Alpha: undefined iowrite32be wanted by module mlx4_en.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

649468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: Important
User: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org

The package linux-2,6 FTBFS on Alpha.  From the log:

  Building modules, stage 2.
  MODPOST 2591 modules
ERROR: "iowrite32be" [drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_en.ko] undefined!

Full log is available at:

In an experiment I changed the config to remove the module mlx4_en from
being built and it successfully built to completion.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.2.1-1
tags 649468 + upstream patch

Michael Cree wrote:

> These functions are used in some PCI drivers with big-endian
> MMIO space.
> Admittedly it is almost certain that no one this side of the
> Moon would use such a card in an Alpha but it does get us
> closer to being able to build allyesconfig or allmodconfig,
> and it enables the Debian default generic config to build.
> Signed-off-by: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz>

Applied in Debian (by Ben), thanks.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: