On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 10:12 +0100, Mathieu Simon wrote: > It would be good to have updated QLogic FC HBA firmware in the. > We're a bit behind with upstream especially with the ql2400 and > ql2500 HBA firmware. > > The update.py pulls things from from upstream FTP albeit I believe > Qlogic has an even newer version on their ftp. (Due to vendor not > updating its CURRENT_VERSIONS file. > > The script would update: > ql2300_fw.bin-3.03.27 -> ql2300_fw.bin-3.03.28 > ql2322_fw.bin-3.03.27 -> ql2322_fw.bin-3.03.28 > ql2400_fw.bin-4.04.05 -> ql2400_fw.bin-5.06.02 > ql2500_fw.bin-4.04.05 -> ql2500_fw.bin-5.06.02 > > Firmware on top level (ftp://ftp.qlogic.com/outgoing/linux/firmware) > seems to be newer, reveals the head of the binary: > > ql2400_fw.bin: [...] ISP24xx Firmware Version 5.06.03 > ql2500_fw.bin: [...] ISP25xx Firmware Version 5.06.03 [...] > Discovering that there is a linux-firmware git repo on > kernel.org I saw that there are also some qlogic firmware > binaries present but mostly even older than what is in > upstream. [...] > Ben seems to be able to push into upstream repo, but Qlogic > doesn't seem to care about this repository that much. > > Should kernel.org either update the binaries - or remove them > to make it clear that Qlogic doesn't help in upstream? Ideally, all firmware that may be requested by Linux drivers should be available from the linux-firmware repository so that distribution packagers can use that as their 'upstream'. Debian is gradually moving towards that. QLogic can assist with this by submitting patches for linux-firmware or a pull request to me and David Woodhouse. I see that such a patch has been provided for firmware for the NIC formerly known as NetXen at <ftp://ftp.qlogic.com/outgoing/linux/NIC/Woodhouse/4.0.534/>. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance. - Robert Coveyou
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part