[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#647587: marked as done (Alpha: missing accept4 syscall)



Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:54:58 +0000
with message-id <1326412498.2819.11.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: Alpha: missing accept4 syscall
has caused the Debian Bug report #647587,
regarding Alpha: missing accept4 syscall
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
647587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647587
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-6
Severity: Important
User: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org

The kernel for the alpha port is missing the accept4 syscall; the
implementation, long overdue, is now in Linus' kernel as commit
0a8c384ebe4cc1c462076732dbffb595e7e81d5c.

Could we please have this cherry-picked to the 3.0.0 kernel (or the
3.1.0 kernel if that is what you plan to upload to unstable next).  It
should apply without modification.

The new version of udev in unstable depends on this syscall and without
it it floods the system logs with error messages filling the disk in
short order.

Cheers
Michael.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.1.1-1

This was fixed a while back, but I forgot to mention the bug in the
changelog.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans.
                                                               - John Lennon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---

Reply to: