[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#655344: linux-image-3.1.0-1-kirkwood: Missing support for LaCie machines



Hi,

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:08:06PM +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Simon Guinot <simon@sequanux.org> writes:
> Hi,
> 
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 3.1.6-1
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > The kernel image provided by package linux-image-3.1.0-1-kirkwood don't
> > support the LaCie Kirkwood boards.
> >
> > Please, consider applying the following patch:
> >
> > diff --git a/config/armel/config.kirkwood b/config/armel/config.kirkwood
> > index 1eae313..85b0c64 100644
> > --- a/config/armel/config.kirkwood
> > +++ b/config/armel/config.kirkwood
> > @@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ CONFIG_MACH_DOCKSTAR=y
> >  CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_BASE=y
> >  CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_CLIENT=y
> >  CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_ULTIMATE=y
> > +CONFIG_MACH_NETSPACE_V2=y
> > +CONFIG_MACH_INETSPACE_V2=y
> > +CONFIG_MACH_NETSPACE_MAX_V2=y
> > +CONFIG_MACH_D2NET_V2=y
> > +CONFIG_MACH_NET2BIG_V2=y
> > +CONFIG_MACH_NET5BIG_V2=y
> >  CONFIG_MACH_T5325=y
> >  
> >  ##
> > @@ -172,6 +178,11 @@ CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS=y
> >  # CONFIG_DRM is not set
> >  
> >  ##
> > +## file: drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > +##
> > +CONFIG_SENSORS_GPIO_FAN=m
> > +
> > +##
> >  ## file: drivers/i2c/Kconfig
> >  ##
> >  CONFIG_I2C=y
> > @@ -244,6 +255,8 @@ CONFIG_ISDN_DIVAS_MAINT=m
> >  CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y
> >  CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=y
> >  CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO=y
> > +CONFIG_LEDS_NS2=y
> > +CONFIG_LEDS_NETXBIG=y
> >  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=y
> >  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER=y
> >  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON=y
> 
> Does this really need to be built-in ? (side note: if it can't work as
> module, why is it a tristate and not a boolean in kernel config ?)

No it doesn't. I should have configured them as modules.
By the way, why is the driver leds-gpio built-in ?

> 
> Also, do you plan to add support for them into d-i (unless it's already
> done) ?

Note that the having d-i support is not mandatory to run Debian on a
LaCie NAS. Please, let's fix the kernel support. On my side, I will have
a look at the Debian installer as quickly as possible (knowing that I am
quite busy this days).

Thanks,

Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: