Bug#647095: CPU hyperthreading turned on after soft power-cycle
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 00:42 +0100, Jiri Polach wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 9:32 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 23:49 +0100, Clarinet wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >>>> Result of bisecting: v2.6.38-rc1 exhibits the problem. v2.6.37 and
> >>>> many of the topic branches merged in the 2.6.38 merge window work ok.
> >>>> Some other topic branches do not boot at all.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jiri: if you have gitk installed, then "git bisect visualize" can help
> >>>> get a sense of what's in the middle of the regression range.
> >>>> "gitk --bisect --first-parent v2.6.37..v2.6.38-rc1" might be a good way
> >>>> to find mainline commits to test before finding a topic branch to delve
> >>>> into.
> >>>
> >>> I have been able to narrow the interval manually a little bit from the
> >>> "top" (the bad side) and I will go on from the bottom now. However,
> >>> there seems to be a large area where kernels are unbootable for me -
> >>> they mostly stop when init is called and I do not know why.
> >>
> >> Finally! After another 50+ compilations a have it! It took some time as
> >> first I had to find a reason why some revisions did not boot (almost 2/3
> >> were unbootable and the first bad commit was among them). Having this
> >> solved I have been able to bisect without "skipping". The result is
> >> surprising (at least for me) - believe it or not, the first bad commit
> >> is 6610e089 "RTC: Rework RTC code to use timerqueue for events" from
> >> John Stultz (I am sending him a copy of this message).
> >>
> >> I would never expect this would be a problem, but my understanding of
> >> this commit is very limited, so I am certainly missing the point.
> >> However, I have tried to compile 2.6.38 (which was "bad") with "Real
> >> Time Clock" configuration option turned off and it behaves "normally"
> >> then (= is "good").
> >
> > Huh. That's *very* odd. Is your system doing anything in-particular
> > with the RTC? I don't have a clue right off, so probably the next step
>
> Yes, it is very odd. The system does not do anything special with RTC.
> It is a diskless computational workstation.
>
> > is doing a bit of instrumentation to try to figure out where exactly we
> > trigger the behavior. Could you checkout commit 6610e089 and apply the
> > patch below to see if we can't narrow it down?
>
> With the patch applied the system does not show the strange behavior (=
> is "good").
>
> > Could you also send your .config to me?
>
> Sure. It is attached. I have found that if I turn CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS
> off, the system behaves normally (= is "good") too.
Yea. My rough guess is that the BIOS is somehow sensitive to how the
CMOS RTC is touched.
Does disabling CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC change the behavior?
thanks
-john
Reply to: