Re: Kernel built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT

[Luis Henriques <luis.henrix@gmail.com>]

Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> writes:

> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:25 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> (why do you keep replying only to the sender?)
>> 
>> Lars Segerlund <lars.segerlund@gmail.com> writes:
> [...]
>> >  I think CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARy is a good choise for the default, since
>> > CONFIG_PREEMPT might give a performance penalty for some loads, I think a
>> > separate kernel packet for low-latency or something would be a good choise.
>> 
>> I see your point, but I'm still not convinced that for a desktop system
>> (the -generic flavour in Debian)
> [...]
>
> Debian doesn't have a 'generic' flavour; you're thinking of Ubuntu.

Ouch!  Of course it doesn't, pardon me my sacrilege! :-)

Cheers,
--
Luis Henriques