Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2011 03:30:39 +0000 with message-id <1297740639.3104.139.camel@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#611806: linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common: scripts/basic/Makefile missing has caused the Debian Bug report #611806, regarding linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common: scripts/basic/Makefile missing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611806 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common: scripts/basic/Makefile missing
- From: Brice Goglin <bgoglin@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:06:43 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110202130643.3714.78801.reportbug@bill.dalton>
Package: linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal Hello, linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common misses scripts/basic/Makefile. This file is needed by scripts/Makefile.build. For instance, it breaks "make kernelrelease" which makes external module build harder. $ make kernelrelease -C /lib/modules/2.6.37-trunk-amd64/build make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-amd64' /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common/scripts/Makefile.build:44: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common/scripts/basic/Makefile: No such file or directory make[4]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common/scripts/basic/Makefile'. Stop. make[3]: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 2.6.37 make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-amd64' The relevant Makefile.build code didn't change recently (it has been including scripts/basic/Makefile since 2007) but the problem didn't occur in the past (at least it works fine with 2.6.32-5 and 2.6.34-1). Now that 2.6.37 seems to use this code easierly, scripts/basic/Makefile should be shipped in headers packages. Thanks, Brice -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 611806-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#611806: linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common: scripts/basic/Makefile missing
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 03:30:39 +0000
- Message-id: <1297740639.3104.139.camel@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110202130643.3714.78801.reportbug@bill.dalton>
- References: <[🔎] 20110202130643.3714.78801.reportbug@bill.dalton>
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 14:06 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > Package: linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common > Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1 > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common misses scripts/basic/Makefile. > This file is needed by scripts/Makefile.build. For instance, > it breaks "make kernelrelease" which makes external module build > harder. > > $ make kernelrelease -C /lib/modules/2.6.37-trunk-amd64/build > make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-amd64' > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common/scripts/Makefile.build:44: > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common/scripts/basic/Makefile: No such file or directory > make[4]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-common/scripts/basic/Makefile'. Stop. > make[3]: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 > 2.6.37 > make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.37-trunk-amd64' [...] You need to pass M=<your-module-directory> (in fact M=dummy will work). You can get away without it for some targets, but in general you should assume this is required. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---