[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608538: btrfs root installation results in initramfs busybox prompt



On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:37 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I hope this can be dealt with, it seems to be the only remaining
> issue in getting Debian to support btrfs root filesystems. 
> 
> This is easily reproducible, I installed from a recent daily build
> netinst, put /boot on ext3 and / on btrfs and same problem on boot.
> 
> The problem is that btrfs depends on libcrc32c, which demand loads
> any of several crc32c implementations, depending on hardware. Those
> modules are not declared as dependencies, so initramfs-tools does not
> include them.
> 
> So, another way to see the same problem:
> 
> root@gnu:/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-686/kernel/crypto>mv crc32c.ko ~  
> root@gnu:/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-686/kernel/crypto>insmod ../lib/libcrc32c.ko 
> insmod: error inserting '../lib/libcrc32c.ko': -1 Unknown symbol in module
> root@gnu:/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-686/kernel/crypto>mv ~/crc32c.ko .
> root@gnu:/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-686/kernel/crypto>insmod ../lib/libcrc32c.ko
> root@gnu:/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-686/kernel/crypto>
> 
> So, at least a workaround would be for the initramfs to have crc32c added to
> it whenever libcrc32c is. Attached patch just adds it to the base modules
> list; since btrfs is already there that seems like an ok quick fix.

This is stupid.  Without a declared module dependency, a MODULES=dep
configuration will remain broken.  I think this needs to be fixed in the
kernel instead.

> Note that it would probably be better to try first loading hardware optimised
> versions like crc32c-intel, and only load crc32c if they fail to load.

I believe that happens automatically, as the hardware-optimised modules
provide an alias of 'crc32c'.

> (BTW, this bug probably also breaks netbooting with certian ethernet cards
> whose drivers also use libcrc32c.)

Right.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: