[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] aufs: Do not refer to AUFS_NAME in pr_fmt



sfjro@users.sourceforge.net dixit:

>test this patch since I don't have m68k environment.

I can do that, but not too many patches at a time, since it takes
easily a whole day to compile it. (Also, my own hacking time is
limited atm.)

>It introduces a new separated file include/linux/aufs_name.h.

Isn’t that a bit overkill?

Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:

>On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 05:46,  <sfjro@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> +/* fs/aufs/Makefile refers this macro */
>> +#define AUFS_NAME              "aufs"
>
>If the Makefile refers to the macro, perhaps the Makefile should
>define it, and pass it with -D?

Indeed. I like Ben’s patch better. But if it must be a separate
file, please move the pr_fmt definition out of the Makefile and
into that file, too. Code doesn’t belong into a Makefile IMHO.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much
*much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of
ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't
wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh


Reply to: