[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#653331: linux-image-3.1.0-1-686-pae: CPU#0 stuck for 23s, system does not boot



--- On Tue, 27/12/11, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:

> From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> Subject: Re: Bug#653331: linux-image-3.1.0-1-686-pae: CPU#0 stuck for 23s, system does not boot
> To: "P. van Gaans" <mailme667@yahoo.co.uk>, 653331@bugs.debian.org
> Date: Tuesday, 27 December, 2011, 7:02
> On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 03:16 +0100, P.
> van Gaans wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 3.1.1-1
> 
> Please try the current version in testing, 3.1.5-1.

I already ran apt-get update && apt-get upgrade, I am running the newest version available. I admit I too wondered why reportbug told me there was a newer version and apt-get disagrees.

> 
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: breaks the whole system
> > 
> > Dear Maintainer,
> > 
> > First of all, thanks for looking into this..
> > 
> > I've installed debian-stable with 2.6.32 kernel.
> > After that, I made the upgrade to wheezy. From that
> moment on,
> > the system no longer boots: http://tinypic.com/r/2u9222q/5
> > "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [swapper:1]"
> > This messages keeps repeating.
> [...]
> 
> And there is also the message 'INFO: rcu_sched_state
> detected stall on
> CPU 0 ...' which is an important clue.
> 
> Assuming that this isn't fixed by the later version, can
> you boot
> without the 'quiet' kernel parameter (e.g. by selecting
> 'recovery mode'
> in GRUB) and report the last messages that appear before
> these errors?

I think I have it:
http://tinypic.com/r/2ni9xu1/5
http://tinypic.com/r/166wrxk/5

I used boot_delay=100 so I could photograph it.

Something that caught my eye at around 18 seconds, but passed to quick to make a picture (even at boot_delay=1000) was "weird, boot CPU (#0) not listed by BIOS" (iirc). I don't know if it's related.

P. van Gaans



Reply to: