Bug#652869: Laptop auto power-on after correct shutdown and being powered-off
severity 652869 important
quit
Hey,
Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot wrote:
> After upgrading to linux-image-3.1.0-amd64 (3.1.5-1) the laptop I use
> works as expected but after shutting it down and being correctly
> powered-off it automatically powers-on after 5 or 6 minutes (this is
> always the same time).
>
> Booting this laptop with linux-image-3.0.0-2-amd64 (3.0.0-6) I can't
> reproduce this problem, even with previous linux-image-3.1.0-amd64
> (prior to 3.1.5-1) I did not have this problem.
Fun.
Please send full "dmesg" output from immediately after bootup.
Could you try this patch[1]?
[1] http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html
-- >8 --
Subject: Revert "rtc: Disable the alarm in the hardware"
This reverts commit 0cbc008c56f7b4a11ba6fe80e196d7ab322baabf.
---
Thanks and hope that helps,
Jonathan
drivers/rtc/interface.c | 44 ++++++++++----------------------------------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/interface.c b/drivers/rtc/interface.c
index 3d9d2b976560..44e91e598f8d 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/interface.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/interface.c
@@ -318,20 +318,6 @@ int rtc_read_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtc_read_alarm);
-static int ___rtc_set_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
-{
- int err;
-
- if (!rtc->ops)
- err = -ENODEV;
- else if (!rtc->ops->set_alarm)
- err = -EINVAL;
- else
- err = rtc->ops->set_alarm(rtc->dev.parent, alarm);
-
- return err;
-}
-
static int __rtc_set_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
{
struct rtc_time tm;
@@ -355,7 +341,14 @@ static int __rtc_set_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
* over right here, before we set the alarm.
*/
- return ___rtc_set_alarm(rtc, alarm);
+ if (!rtc->ops)
+ err = -ENODEV;
+ else if (!rtc->ops->set_alarm)
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ else
+ err = rtc->ops->set_alarm(rtc->dev.parent, alarm);
+
+ return err;
}
int rtc_set_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
@@ -769,20 +762,6 @@ static int rtc_timer_enqueue(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_timer *timer)
return 0;
}
-static void rtc_alarm_disable(struct rtc_device *rtc)
-{
- struct rtc_wkalrm alarm;
- struct rtc_time tm;
-
- __rtc_read_time(rtc, &tm);
-
- alarm.time = rtc_ktime_to_tm(ktime_add(rtc_tm_to_ktime(tm),
- ktime_set(300, 0)));
- alarm.enabled = 0;
-
- ___rtc_set_alarm(rtc, &alarm);
-}
-
/**
* rtc_timer_remove - Removes a rtc_timer from the rtc_device timerqueue
* @rtc rtc device
@@ -804,10 +783,8 @@ static void rtc_timer_remove(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_timer *timer)
struct rtc_wkalrm alarm;
int err;
next = timerqueue_getnext(&rtc->timerqueue);
- if (!next) {
- rtc_alarm_disable(rtc);
+ if (!next)
return;
- }
alarm.time = rtc_ktime_to_tm(next->expires);
alarm.enabled = 1;
err = __rtc_set_alarm(rtc, &alarm);
@@ -869,8 +846,7 @@ again:
err = __rtc_set_alarm(rtc, &alarm);
if (err == -ETIME)
goto again;
- } else
- rtc_alarm_disable(rtc);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&rtc->ops_lock);
}
--
1.7.8
Reply to: