Bug#625806: kernel erroneously reports continuous changes in the connected displays
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for looking in to this, I now use testing (wheezy) with kernel
3.1.0-1-686-pae and everything works fine.
In general I had no problem with display geometry with the 3.x kernels,
I tried all the available ones in testing, sid and experimental since
3.x became available.
Only a couple of times, after updating some gnome packages the display
size is set to 1024x768 instead of 1366x768. Just that, no flickering
and no crash. I assume that it's a gnome issue since it happened only
after upgrading gnome related packages and a reboot solved the problem
in both cases.
This is unrelated, I've been trying all the available kernels because in
the new gnome 3 interface (gnome shell) I can see the battery icon
appearing and disappearing every 30 seconds or so, as if after charging,
the battery starts discharging again for a few seconds and then
recharging again. I haven't reported this yet because I still don't
understand which package causes this issue.
Regards,
Paolo.
On 11/26/2011 05:11 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> found 625806 linux-2.6/2.6.38-1
> quit
>
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Paolo Scarabelli wrote:
>
>> gnome-settings-daemon sometimes crashes after login, it happens all the
>> times with kernel 3.6.37 and sometimes in 3.6.38. It also occasionally
>> (rarely) happened with early releases of kernel 2.6.32.
>>
>> After login, the screens starts flickering while the desktop geometry
>> (as seen in Workspace Switcher) changes continuously, from about a 2x3
>> to a 2x4 rectangle. Something like xinerama with an external monitor.
>
> Odd.
>
> Sorry for the long quiet. Can you reproduce it (the geometry flickering,
> not the crash) with a current squeeze or sid kernel? If so, please attach
> /var/log/Xorg.0.log and "dmesg" output after reproducing it. Either
> way, please attach full "dmesg" output from booting up, so we can get
> to know your setup a little better.
>
> Thanks for reporting, and hope that helps.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jonathan
>
>
Reply to: