Bug#605090: [grsec] update on featureset
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 10/11/2011 18:06, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Maybe we can ask upstream, whether the RBAC code and the rest of the
> patch set can be separated? I don't think there's much interest in RBAC
> for a Debian feature set, while the rest is quite interesting.
>
Unfortunately, I already asked upstream about a nicely splitted patch,
but Brad didn't seem interested back in time. It might be worth
re-asking though.
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis Perez
ANSSI/ACE/LAM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=j3zh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: