Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:55:28 -0400, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:41:37AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > I think we need a "taint_string()" function, and instead of lockdep
> > disabling itself it should note the taint string in its reports.
> > Similarly for anything else (oops already does this).
>
> you mean like print_tainted() ?
Wow, there's one terribly named function!
So, yeah, kinda like that. Only remove the suckage.
Thanks,
Rusty.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
- Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
- Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
- Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
- From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
- Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
- From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
- Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
- Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree
- From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>