On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 10:15 +0100, ael wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 09:07:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 19:42 +0100, ael wrote: > > > Package: linux-2.6 > > > Version: 3.0.0-3 > > > Severity: normal > > > Tags: upstream > > > > > > > > > Regression in the ark3116 (perhaps interaction with usbserial). > > > > > > The hardware is a USB ->serial port converter. > > > It was last used on this machine running debian testing in December > > > 2011. It ran successfully with the debian kernel at that time. > > > > Please can you test with an older kernel package (they are still > > available from <http://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux-2.6/>) to > > verify that this is definitely a difference between kernel versions. > > I was going to try that but I am away from home with limited > connectivity. Just hope that I don't hit dependency hell... > Any easy way to discover which binary was current back in December? > The lack of a release date in debs I find awkward. [...] In December, testing/unstable saw versions 2.6.32-{28,29,30} and experimental saw 2.6.36-1~experimental.1 followed by various 2.6.37 release candidates. Maybe you should just test the current version from squeeze. Ben.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part