[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#605090: Updated patch



On mer., 2011-02-23 at 13:36 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer., 2011-01-26 at 14:54 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > >
> > http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/linux-grsec-base.git;a=summary
> > > if
> > > > > needed.
> > > > Why is this not part of the patch below?
> > > The grsec.conf was attached to the initial bug report. As there is
> > no
> > > easy way to ship an external file in the linux-image, I was told
> > it'd be
> > > a better idea to make an external package and that helps because I
> > can
> > > do the user creation there and add a README.
> > 
> > External _binary_ package, not source package.
> 
> What's the correct way to add a new binary package to linux-2.6. I've
> checked the current package and there's the xen-linux-system package
> which seems to be xen specific. It has some templates files in
> debian/templates and some specific treatment in
> debian/bin/gencontrol.py. 
> 
> Should I add some templates too and modify the gencontrol.py to create
> that new binary package or should I refrain to touch it.

I've tried to add templates but it still lacks the proper gencontrol.py
logic. Any indication on what exactly is needed there would help.
> > 
> > > > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS=y
> > > > Please show why this should not be enabled globaly.
> > > Good point, it should. I'll make a separated bug report.
> > 
> > No need for a bug.
> 
> What's the status for this? Current 2.6.37 builds fine with that option
> enabled.

So there /was/ a need for a bug, since this got completely lost. This is
#639919

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis Perez
ANSSI/ACE/LAM

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: