Bug#623149: marked as done (Lenovo S10-3 fails to resume from hibernation)
Your message dated Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:46:32 -0500
with message-id <20110827224632.GA7674@elie.gateway.2wire.net>
and subject line Re: resuming from hibernation sometimes fails on eeepc 1002HA
has caused the Debian Bug report #622259,
regarding Lenovo S10-3 fails to resume from hibernation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
622259: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622259
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: important
Hi,
I sure the last thing Ben needs is another netbook hibernation resume failure, but here we go.
Using a Lenovo ideapad S10-3 (which afaik is a pretty much standard pine trail netbook), squeeze installed from scratch, the system fails to resume from hibernation in a similar way to bugs #613790 and #611750.
Downgrading to 2.6.32-29 makes hibernation work. 2.6.32-30 and 2.6.32-31 do not work. Unlike some of the other submitters I have never had success with the latter kernels. It's not even intermittent. 100% failure.
Please let me know if I can supply any more information. I'm perfectly capable of compiling the odd kernel if I get the time.
Thanks,
robert.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.39-3
Robert Scott wrote:
> Success.
>
> Hibernation works with 2.6.39-bpo.2-686-pae.
>
> This is on a Lenovo Ideapad S10-3.
Thanks for checking. Drat. The next thing to check would be if this
is reproducible with v2.6.32.45 or v2.6.33.18 from kernel.org, so we
can get upstream's help in figuring out where backporting the "use
mwait to offline a processor" patch went wrong.
By the way, what CPU do you use? (Please attach /proc/cpuinfo.)
--- End Message ---
Reply to: