Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: root filesystem (LVM) not recognised

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:55:28PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>> <lkcl@lkcl.net> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Valentijn Scholten
>> > <valentijnscholten@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hello Luke,
>> >> Thanks for jumping in.
>> >> I only have a /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64 at the moment.
>> >> This is the one probably generated (reinstalled) after I reinstalled Squeeze
>> >> on top of the existing problematic install.
>> >
>> >  ah.  _drat_.  that's exactly what i did, and it overwrote...
>> >
>> >> There's no initrd img for 2.6.39, there's the kernel image itself however.
>> >
>> >  oh wait... let me get this straight: there's *no* 2.6.39 initrd??
>> >
>> >  so, let us be clear: you installed 2.6.39-bp0.2-amd64 and yet there
>> > is no file /boot/initrd-2.6.39-bp0.2-amd64 to match??
>>
>>
>>  so - let's repeat the steps.  could you confirm, yes or no, that you
>> took the following steps, and/or correct them if necessary:
> [...]
>
> Luke, you are not involved in maintenance of these packages and you
> are now interfering with my handling of Valentijn's bug report.

 ben,

 you are interfering with an ongoing investigation to the benefit of
the debian community, to resolve a complex issue.

 please desist from being insulting, patronising, or otherwise
polluting the bugreport system with unnecessary clutter.

> Valentijn, please open a new bug report as requested and do not
> spend time answering Luke's questions.

 valentijn,

 ben has been displaying quite insulting behaviour towards my
bugreports which were written to do the best that i could to help
improve the debian project.

 please make up your own mind as to what action to take.

 l.