Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable "kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534" from Postfix on ext4
- To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, 615998@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: "Moffett, Kyle D" <Kyle.D.Moffett@boeing.com>, Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>, Sean Ryle <seanbo@gmail.com>, "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Subject: Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable "kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534" from Postfix on ext4
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:58:40 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1309269520.3093.1574.camel@localhost>
- Reply-to: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, 615998@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110628093652.GA29978@quack.suse.cz>
- References: <[🔎] BANLkTi=5BLA07tvbv3PFcZ0cc8FmBtg+UA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 404FD5CC-8F27-4336-B7D4-10675C53A588@boeing.com> <[🔎] 20110624134659.GB26380@quack.suse.cz> <[🔎] 2F80BF45-28FA-46D3-9A28-CA9416DC5813@boeing.com> <[🔎] 20110624200231.GA32176@quack.suse.cz> <[🔎] alpine.LFD.2.00.1106271312310.3845@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com> <[🔎] 20110627140251.GI5597@quack.suse.cz> <[🔎] alpine.LFD.2.00.1106271714350.3845@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com> <[🔎] 20110627160140.GC2729@thunk.org> <[🔎] 2D8D1A30-C092-4163-B47A-BCEDACE536A3@boeing.com> <[🔎] 20110628093652.GA29978@quack.suse.cz>
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:36 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 27-06-11 23:21:17, Moffett, Kyle D wrote:
[...]
> > Please correct me if this is horribly horribly wrong:
> >
> > no journal:
> > Nothing is journalled
> > + Very fast.
> > + Works well for filesystems that are "mkfs"ed on every boot
> > - Have to fsck after every reboot
> Fsck is needed only after a crash / hard powerdown. Otherwise completely
> correct. Plus you always have a possibility of exposing uninitialized
> (potentially sensitive) data after a fsck.
>
> Actually, normal desktop might be quite happy with non-journaled filesystem
> when fsck is fask enough.
[...]
With no journal, there is a fair risk that fsck cannot recover the
filesystem automatically (let alone the actual data). And normal users
should never have to suffer questions from fsck.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Reply to: