Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?

[maximilian attems <max@stro.at>]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
> Hi ola,
> 
> my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero.
> 
> see
> http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary
> 
> and in contrary
> http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1

wrong c&p, meant of course,
see how happily that tree is maintained regularly:
http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel6/042stab017.1
 
> They *don't* update their git tree.
> come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41
> 
> So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated
> stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different.
>