On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 18:24 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Robert Millan dixit: > > >I can see they wouldn't be excited about it, but they might also accept > > You know that there are more than one BSD, but only one glibc, > IIRC Drepper isn’t even its maintainer any more. According to <http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/> "Ulrich Drepper is currently the foremost contributor and has overall responsibility for maintenance and development." > Try persuading > for example Theo de Raadt of anything which doesn’t have any > immediate technical merit… have fun ;-) > > Honestly, when resolving this I’d go for “who has the older > rights”. Maybe look at how CSUR resolves different claims to > the same part of the Unicode PUA, or something like that. > Nevertheless, thanks on picking this up. Debian GNU/Linux is the older system; the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD maintainers have to deal with compatibility issues. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part