On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:26 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:00 +0000, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > Package: linux-2.6 > > > Version: 3.0.0~rc2-1~experimental.1 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > SUBLEVEL is reserved for -stable in kernel 3.0 and > > > newer. As Debian kernels did not include the part > > > of the version number used for stable updates in > > > the past, I expect that you are not planning to > > > include them now. > > > > > > Thus, the package names should be linux-image-3.0-*, > > > not linux-image-3.0.0-*. > > > > no. > > next time ask on d-kernel for advise before filing useless reports. > Then please explain why. The kernel's version is 3.0, not 3.0.0. Once > there is 3.0.X, do you want to introduce new linux-image-3.0.X-* > packages every few weeks? No. > There appears to be no reason for using 3.0.0, > upstream uses 3.0, others use 3.0, so why deviate? [...] Version numbers in package names should match utsname::release. And utsname::release still includes SUBLEVEL (3.0.0-rc3). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Larkinson's Law: All laws are basically false.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part