On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:06 +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote: [...] > I can understand if debian doesn't want to fix this bug. But corrupting > data when users try to rescue their data with a too large dd blocksize > is clearly too important to let people like you just make blatant wrong > statements and close valid bugreports. [...] So really you're surprised by the way dd handles short reads. And I agree that it is surprising. But that is a problem (arguably a bug) in dd, not the kernel. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. - Harrison
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part