Bug#534964: Any updates on this BUG?
* Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> [2011-05-23 00:10:13]:
> On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 17:35 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > * maximilian attems <maks@debian.org> [2011-05-12 11:53:25]:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:08:10PM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:33:31AM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:43:06PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > > > > <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi, Ben,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We've made significant progress in reducing the overhead of memory
> > > > > > > cgroup subsystem. I'd request you to try it and enable it. If there
> > > > > > > are some concerns, we could always address them. There are more
> > > > > > > interesting changes on the way as well.
> > > >
> > > > could you point to the relevant commits?
> > >
> > > so unless this information comes along soon,
> > > I'll revert my change.
> > >
> >
> > I sent some information earlier, I hope it was useful. BTW, I don't
> > see memory cgroups enabled in debian experimental (changelog), should I be looking
> > elsewhere?
>
> They're enabled in 2.6.39-1 (in sid). However, I actually meant them to
> be disabled by default, and that will be done in 2.6.39-2.
>
Oops, but why do you want to disable them by default? Other distros
have them enabled, disabled implies more boot options required, lesser
testing of the feature and feedback. Is there a strong reason to
change it?
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
Reply to: