Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2011 03:17:51 +0100 with message-id <1305771471.19966.179.camel@localhost> and subject line Re: No backport available for squeeze for package firmware-bnx2 has caused the Debian Bug report #625293, regarding No backport available for squeeze for package firmware-bnx2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 625293: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625293 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: No backport available for squeeze for package firmware-bnx2
- From: Sebastian Bauer <Sebastian.Bauer@charite.de>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 10:29:24 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4DBFBCE4.4030507@charite.de>
Subject: No backport available for squeeze for package firmware-bnx2 Package: firmware-bnx2 Severity: wishlist It would be nice if the latest firmware-bnx (0.29) could be migrated to squeeze backports as well as the current version 0.28 doesn't seem to support the kernel 2.6.38 that is available in squeeze backports.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 625293-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: No backport available for squeeze for package firmware-bnx2
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 03:17:51 +0100
- Message-id: <1305771471.19966.179.camel@localhost>
No backport is required; just install the version in testing. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---