[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#624131: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-686-pae: Can somewhat reliably produce kernel panic in btrfs code)

Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 05:07:42 +0100
with message-id <1305259662.4065.406.camel@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#624131: linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-686-pae: Can somewhat reliably produce kernel panic in btrfs code
has caused the Debian Bug report #624131,
regarding linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-686-pae: Can somewhat reliably produce kernel panic in btrfs code
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

624131: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624131
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.39-rc4-686-pae
Version: 2.6.39~rc4-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental

By simply stressing the system with some I/O, I can make it crash within
seconds. I'm not setting a higher severity because the bug is in an
experimental file system in an experimental kernel.

Here's the important bits (by my guess) I have on screen from the kernel panic:

Bug at fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1246
Bug type: invalid opcode: 0000
Kernel not tainted, running on an ASUSTek 1005HAG
EIP is at btrfs_add_free_space+0x285/0x39a [btrfs]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.39~rc5-1~experimental.1

On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 14:00 +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:59, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > This fix doesn't seem to be in your for-linux branch yet.  Please can
> > you ensure that this (or an alternate fix) is included in 2.6.39.
> It seems to be in. I also haven't noticed panics with rc5/rc6. Just in
> case you want to close this one.

Thanks for letting us know.


Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--- End Message ---

Reply to: