On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 12:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Ian, should we apply the backport from > > 64141da587241301ce8638cc945f8b67853156ec to squeeze for bug #613634 et > > al? > > It's already in SVN for 2.6.32-34, seems to be in the changelog twice > even, once closing #614400 and then again closing #613634, which are > merged. Oh right, it's applied to the xen-featureset kernels. But isn't it also applicable to non-xen-featureset kernels which can run in domU? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part