On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > > > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e. > > > > > Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed a.s.a.p: > [...] > > > The kernel's now built everywhere; thanks for following up on that. As > > > this is the first time that we've actively pushed a non-security stable > > > kernel update outside of the point release route, we'd prefer that it be > > > opened to testing from a wider selection of users than most p-u kernels > > > receive. > [...] > > I think there's still a Xen regression (since 2.6.32-31) to be fixed. > > I'm assuming that's #621072, which it looks like a resolution has been > found for? Right. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part