Your message dated Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:13:56 +0200 with message-id <4DB11CA4.4080909@debian.org> and subject line Re: Invalid shell option in start-statd has caused the Debian Bug report #621027, regarding Invalid shell option in start-statd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 621027: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621027 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Invalid shell option in start-statd
- From: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 02:33:49 +0200
- Message-id: <20110405003349.GA2258@alea.gnuu.de>
Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.2.3-1 Severity: important % head -n1 =start-statd #!/bin/sh -p % /bin/sh -p -c true /bin/sh: Illegal option -p % ls -l =sh lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 17. Dez 18:49 /bin/sh -> dash The option -p is not a valid option for dash, that's the default for sh. Bye, Jörg.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 621027-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Invalid shell option in start-statd
- From: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:13:56 +0200
- Message-id: <4DB11CA4.4080909@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1104220808050.2310@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>
- References: <4DA029EF.3080204@debian.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1104091201001.2411@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1104220808050.2310@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>
Version: 1:1.2.3-2 On 04/22/2011 08:08 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Marc Glisse wrote: > >> On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Luk Claes wrote: >> >>> Do you have rpcbind installed? Do you still have issues with the latest >>> upload (1:1.2.3-2)? >> >> No, I appear to have portmap instead. I'll test the new upload (and >> thus the switch to rpcbind) when I get back > > It seems to be working fine, thank you. Thanks. Closing this bug. Cheers Luk
--- End Message ---