[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#562737: closed by Luk Claes <luk@debian.org> (Bug#562737: fixed in nfs-utils 1:1.2.2-5)



On 03/28/2011 09:41 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> found 562737 1:1.2.3-1
> thanks
> 
> Seen in an update today in an otherwise fully updated Sid machine:
> 
>   $ sudo apt-get install nfs-common
>   Reading package lists... Done
>   Building dependency tree       
>   Reading state information... Done
>   The following extra packages will be installed:
>     libtirpc1
>   The following NEW packages will be installed:
>     libtirpc1
>   The following packages will be upgraded:
>     nfs-common
>   1 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>   Need to get 349 kB of archives.
>   After this operation, 311 kB of additional disk space will be used.
>   Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
>   Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid/main libtirpc1 amd64 0.2.1-1 [84.2 kB]
>   Get:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid/main nfs-common amd64 1:1.2.3-1 [265 kB]
>   Fetched 349 kB in 2s (141 kB/s)      
>   Selecting previously deselected package libtirpc1.
>   (Reading database ... 324385 files and directories currently installed.)
>   Unpacking libtirpc1 (from .../libtirpc1_0.2.1-1_amd64.deb) ...
>   Preparing to replace nfs-common 1:1.2.2-5 (using .../nfs-common_1%3a1.2.3-1_amd64.deb) ...
>   Unpacking replacement nfs-common ...
>   Processing triggers for man-db ...
>   Setting up libtirpc1 (0.2.1-1) ...
>   Setting up nfs-common (1:1.2.3-1) ...
>   Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/nfs-common ...
>   Stopping NFS common utilities: idmapd statd.
>   Starting NFS common utilities: statd failed!
> 
> And restarting manually emits:
> 
>   # service nfs-common restart
>   Stopping NFS common utilities: idmapd statd.
>   Starting NFS common utilities: statd failed!

Can you please add 'set -x' on the second line of /etc/init.d/nfs-common
and give the output from 'service nfs-common restart' so we get an idea
in what step it fails, TIA?

Cheers

Luk



Reply to: