[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#611750: Bug#613790: 2nd update (Re: Bug#613790: pm-utils: eeepc 1005 PE recently stopped resuming from hibernate)



On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 13:07 +0100, Frédéric Boiteux wrote:
> Le Sun, 06 Mar 2011 00:50:50 +0000,
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> a écrit :
> 
> > You can find all the individual patches as a quilt series in:
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32.git
> > 
> > subdirectory releases/2.6.32.28.
> > 
> > Since quilt doesn't have a bisect command you would have to have to
> > keep track of good and bad positions in the series yourself.  I would
> > guess that it's most likely one of:
> > 
> > releases/2.6.32.28/pm-hibernate-fix-pm_post_-notification-with-user-space-suspend.patch
> > releases/2.6.32.28/x86-enable-the-intr-remap-fault-handling-after-local-apic-setup.patch
> > 
> > so you could try reverting those before going through the whole
> > series.
> 
> 
> 	Hello Ben,
> 
>   I've done the manual bisecting with 2.6.32.28 patches, and with 6
> tries (and 2 more checks to be sure), I found that the patch causing
> hibernation resume failures was :
> 
> x86-hotplug-use-mwait-to-offline-a-processor-fix-the-legacy-case.patch
> 
> I've done about ten successfull hibernation/resume cycles with a
> 2.6.32-30 without this patch, and I'm using it since the end of my
> bisecting with success.
> 
> I've also read on bug #611750's log that  the new
> linux-image-2.6.32-5-686_2.6.32-31_i386 could have a fix for this
> problem, perhaps you could look if there is a patch in this latest
> version fixing the previous faulty patch I've identified here.

I can't see any fix that looks related to this, but please do try the
new version.  You will need to add the 'stable-proposed-updates' suite
in /etc/apt/sources.list.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: