Re: Bug#616690: RFH: nfs-utils -- NFS support files common to client and server
On 03/06/2011 07:37 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:41 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 03/06/2011 06:11 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> I'm willing to help out. What bugs or area do you want me to prioritise on?
>
> I think the most urgent would be reported regressions from lenny to
> squeeze.
I had a look at the outstanding bugs. Unless there are kerberos or nfs4
related regressions, there don't seem to be real regressions reported.
The issues that are reported quite a lot are problems related with the
init scripts though. Do you mind if I try to come up with some init
script changes that make sure depended on services are tested for
availability and services don't hang unnecessary?
I have the feeling that changes there would be welcomed most by our
userbase as I can read quite some frustration in the bug reports.
Cheers
Luk
PS: The reason so many bugs are reported related to initscripts very
probably are a result from the different behaviour of the init system
(running things in parallel) and hotplug system (background handling if
possible) and/or cleaning up of other init scripts which cause faster
execution of our init scripts.
Reply to: