[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#614342: marked as done (linux-source-2.6.37: intel backlight patch)



Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2011 08:23:55 +0100
with message-id <201103070823.57886.def@gmx.at>
and subject line Fixed in 2.6.37-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #614342,
regarding linux-source-2.6.37: intel backlight patch
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
614342: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614342
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-source-2.6.37
Version: 2.6.37-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream sid patch


It is a known issue upstream that on Intel GPUs when DPMS blanks the screen
the backlight stays turned off when the screen is turned back on.

Chris Wilson committed a patch for this to upstream here
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672#c42

which can be downloaded here
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=43272

and I can confirm that this patch fixes the issue with 2.6.37.

Upstream it will be part of 2.6.38.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.37def2 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-source-2.6.37
Version: 2.6.37-2
Tags: fixed

The bug occurred in package version 2.6.37-1,
it no longer occurs in 2.6.37-2.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: