[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#605090: Updated patch



On mer., 2011-01-26 at 14:54 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > >
> http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/linux-grsec-base.git;a=summary
> > if
> > > > needed.
> > > Why is this not part of the patch below?
> > The grsec.conf was attached to the initial bug report. As there is
> no
> > easy way to ship an external file in the linux-image, I was told
> it'd be
> > a better idea to make an external package and that helps because I
> can
> > do the user creation there and add a README.
> 
> External _binary_ package, not source package.

What's the correct way to add a new binary package to linux-2.6. I've
checked the current package and there's the xen-linux-system package
which seems to be xen specific. It has some templates files in
debian/templates and some specific treatment in
debian/bin/gencontrol.py. 

Should I add some templates too and modify the gencontrol.py to create
that new binary package or should I refrain to touch it.
> 
> > > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS=y
> > > Please show why this should not be enabled globaly.
> > Good point, it should. I'll make a separated bug report.
> 
> No need for a bug.

What's the status for this? Current 2.6.37 builds fine with that option
enabled.

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis Perez
ANSSI/ACE/LAM

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: