Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:49:13 +0100 with message-id <1296409754.17149.7.camel@jak-thinkpad> and subject line Re: Bug#611555: initramfs-tools: Modules needed for btrfs not included in initramfs has caused the Debian Bug report #611555, regarding initramfs-tools: Modules needed for btrfs not included in initramfs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 611555: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611555 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: initramfs-tools: Modules needed for btrfs not included in initramfs
- From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:22:31 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110130181824.GA15437@debian.org>
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.98.8 Severity: important The btrfs module depends on libcrc32c which requires a crc32c provider like crc32c, but does not specify it in depends; and the module is thus not included. The result is that if you choose to install with / formatted as btrfs, the installation is not able to boot. A possible solution is to include the crc32c module whenever a module requests libcrc32c. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (250, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages initramfs-tools depends on: ii cpio 2.11-6 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar ii findutils 4.4.2-1+b1 utilities for finding files--find, ii klibc-utils 1.5.21-1 small utilities built with klibc f ii module-init-tools 3.12-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii udev 164-4 /dev/ and hotplug management daemo Versions of packages initramfs-tools recommends: ii busybox 1:1.17.1-8 Tiny utilities for small and embed Versions of packages initramfs-tools suggests: ii bash-completion 1:1.2-3 programmable completion for the ba -- Configuration Files: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools changed [not included] -- no debconf information -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.Attachment: pgpIvBLxoKQWn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org>
- Cc: 611555-close@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#611555: initramfs-tools: Modules needed for btrfs not included in initramfs
- From: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:49:13 +0100
- Message-id: <1296409754.17149.7.camel@jak-thinkpad>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2011-01-30T18-35-27@devnull.michael-prokop.at>
- References: <[🔎] 20110130181824.GA15437@debian.org> <[🔎] 2011-01-30T18-35-27@devnull.michael-prokop.at>
On So, 2011-01-30 at 18:38 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote: > * Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> [Sun Jan 30, 2011 at 06:22:31PM +0100]: > > Version: 0.98.8 > > > The btrfs module depends on libcrc32c which requires a crc32c > > provider like crc32c, but does not specify it in depends; and > > the module is thus not included. The result is that if you > > choose to install with / formatted as btrfs, the installation > > is not able to boot. > > > A possible solution is to include the crc32c module whenever > > a module requests libcrc32c. > > Since you're reporting against version 0.98.8: > > | initramfs-tools (0.98.8) unstable; urgency=high > | [...] > | * [78d9e04] initramfs-tools: Handle hidden dependency of libcrc32c on > | crc32c. (Closes: #608538) > > This is supposed to provide exactly what you're asking for. > What am I missing? OK, I obviously did not upgrade my kvm guest and reported the bug from the host. I just freshy installed the guest and did not expect missing upgrades, but forgot that I was not connected to the internet at install time and thus installed old versions from CD without upgrade. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.
--- End Message ---