[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Possible bug in kernel 2.6.37



Hi Jean,

Given that the 2.6.37 kernel is only in experimental I think Debian can
only offer very limited support for it.

I recommend you stick with your dialog with upstream, it is likely to be
the most effective way to get to the bottom of the issue.

Ian.

On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:02 +0100, Jean Baptiste FAVRE wrote: 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hello,
> I'm not sure this is neither the right place, nor the right way to
> introduce my problem, but I've only small kernel knowledge. Please
> excuse me if I'm wrong.
> 
> I'm using 2 Debian Squeeze Xen Dom0 servers. Those 2 servers provide PCI
> passthrough for a network card.
> The idea is to filter network trafic inside dedicated domU instead of
> having dom0 directly connected on the network.
> 
> For my tests, I choose Debian Squeeze with 2.6.37 kernel from
> experimental. Here are the results:
> - - Debian Squeeze 32bits + 32bits 2.6.37 kernel: incoming packets larger
> than 128 bytes are blocked "somewhere".
> - - Debian Squeeze 32bits + 64bits 2.6.37 kernel: everything works fine.
> - - Debian Squeeze 64bits + 64bits 2.6.37 kernel: everything works fine.
> 
> My first thought was I discovered a bug in Xen PCI passthrough code.
> I exchange some mails on xen-devel mailing list about it, mostly with
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk.
> He asked me to do many tests which did not help to diagnose the problem.
> 
> Then he suggest me to change memory allocated to domU from 256mb to 512mb.
> 
> That solved my problem.
> 
> Now, I don't know exactly what I shall do.
> 
> Any help will be appreciated,
> Regards,
> Jean Baptiste Favre
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk1Afb8ACgkQM2eZoKJfKd3Y/QCgtMm2sTTj3VL/0hyPkMoP8my4
> 2lEAoKy13l/NiQBscuzCNmlgLc4aHfur
> =HIsl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 

-- 
Ian Campbell

If anything can go wrong, it will.


Reply to: